Carlos Ghosn was a charismatic and innovative CEO of Nissan who was admired and respected globally. However, his success was not received well by the Nissan board of directors and the government of Japan, who held feelings of envy “Netami (妬み)” toward him. This envy eventually led to his arrest and downfall.
Ghosn's leadership of Nissan marked a turning point
for the company, which was on the verge of bankruptcy in the late 1990s. He
implemented several reforms, such as cost-cutting measures, reducing debt, and
expanding the company's global reach. He also played a significant role in the
creation of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance, which became one of the
largest automotive companies in the world.
However, despite his successes, the Nissan board of
directors and the Japanese government were uncomfortable with his high profile
and the influence he held over the company. Ghosn was seen as a foreigner who
was taking control of a Japanese company, and his compensation package was
perceived as excessive.
In 2018, Ghosn was arrested in Tokyo on charges of
financial misconduct. The accusations included under-reporting his future income,
transferring personal losses to Nissan, and misusing company funds. The trial
was widely covered in the media, and Ghosn was eventually found guilty and
sentenced to several years in prison.
Many believe that Ghosn's arrest was politically motivated,
and a way for the Japanese government and Nissan board of directors to
undermine his power and take control of the company. The case also raised
questions about the legal system in Japan, which has a high conviction rate and
a lack of transparency in the trial process.
The envy of Carlos Ghosn by the Nissan board of
directors and the government of Japan led to his downfall. He was a visionary
leader who brought significant change and growth to Nissan, but his success
made him a target for those who felt threatened by his influence. The case
highlights the challenges that foreign executives face in Japan and the
importance of transparency in the legal system.
Comments
Post a Comment